Tinubu’s Inauguration:Court awards N17m against 3 litigants, lawyer 

na_logo

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get Daily News, Tips, Trends and Updates in your mailbox

Latest News

The Right Place for you comfort furniture's

Living Room

We offer a wide variety of furniture for homes and offices

Dinning Set

We provide stylish and high-quality dinning interior furnishing solutions.

Bedroom

We manufacture and produce complete bedroom furniture and interior furnishing products.

Share

Join us in a transformative journey towards better care for Deltans and support for all.

Justice James Omotoso of the Federal High Court, Abuja, Friday awarded N17 million fine against  three litigants and their lawyer for filing a frivolous suit seeking to stop the inauguration of the President-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

The decision is coming just hours after the Supreme Court dismissed another suit filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to void the candidacy of Tinubu and the Vice-president elect, Kashim Shettma.

The litigants, Praise Ilemona,  Pastor Paul Issac Audu  and Dr Anongu Moses jointly instituted the suit praying for an order to halt the May 29 swearing-in of Tinubu.

Dismissing the suit, the court held that it was frivolous and an abuse of court process.

The Judge held that the plaintiffs lacked the locus standi to file the suit, adding that the court could not exercise jurisdiction to hear it because it relates to a presidential election.

The three litigants are to jointly pay the President-elect a sum of N10 million and another N5 million to the All Progressives Congress (APC) who were part of the seven defendants in the suit.

The judgement held that an interest of 10 percentage be placed on the judgment debt per year until when finally liquidated.

Meanwhile, counsel to the petitioners, Daniel Elomah who filed the suit was ordered to pay N1m to Tinubu and the APC each.

Elomah in his motion alleged that the President-elect, Bola Tinubu supplied false information to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) about his age and citizenship status.

Elomah had pleaded with the court to pardon his clients and advised that the court should counsel them against embarking frivolous suit in future.

In his argument, counsel to Tinubu, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, had argued that the suit be dismissed on the ground that the three plaintiffs lacked locus standi to institute it

He submitted that non of the plaintiffs participated in the primary election that produced the President-elect but chose to harass, intimidate and irritate Tinubu through frivolous suit.

Fagbemi SAN further argued that the litigants engaged in gross abuse of court by their multiple cases against Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress in various courts without any reasonable cause of action.

Related Post