Presidency Reacts To Supreme Court Ruling On Local Government Autonomy

na_logo

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get Daily News, Tips, Trends and Updates in your mailbox

Latest News

The Right Place for you comfort furniture's

Living Room

We offer a wide variety of furniture for homes and offices

Dinning Set

We provide stylish and high-quality dinning interior furnishing solutions.

Bedroom

We manufacture and produce complete bedroom furniture and interior furnishing products.

Share

Join us in a transformative journey towards better care for Deltans and support for all.

The presidency has reacted to Thursday’s victory against 36 state governors at the Supreme Court on local government autonomy.

The Supreme Court ruled that all federal allocations for local government councils should be paid directly into their accounts.

In Nigeria, most states operate a joint account with local governments, Justice Emmanuel Agim, who led a seven-member panel of justices, said local government allocation should be paid directly to a separate account belonging to each local government.

The federal government through the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) approached the Supreme Court, in a suit, marked SC/CV/343/2024, and sought that 36 governors of the federation grant full autonomy to the 774 local governments.

Giving details of federal government’s prayer in the suit, Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, on his X handle on Thursday, wrote, “The details of the Supreme Court ruling giving 774 local councils financial autonomy

“The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that all federal funds for local government councils should be paid directly into their accounts.

“Justice Emmanuel Agim, who led a seven-member panel of justices, delivered the judgment in a suit filed by the federal government against the 36 state governors.

“According to the judgment, henceforth, no more payments of local government area allocations will be made to state government accounts. The court also prohibited the governors from receiving, tampering with, or withholding funds meant for local governments.

“Furthermore, the court barred the governors from dissolving democratically elected officials for local governments and deemed such actions a breach of the 1999 Constitution.

“The federal government had approached the Supreme Court with a suit seeking to compel the governors of the 36 federating states to grant full autonomy to local governments in their domains. The suit, marked SC/CV/343/2024, was filed by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), on behalf of the Federal Government.

“The Federal Government accused the state governors of gross misconduct and abuse of power in its suit, which was based on 27 grounds. In the originating summons, the FG prayed the Supreme Court to make an order stating that funds standing to the credit of local governments from the Federation Account should be paid directly to the local governments rather than through the state governments.

“The justice minister also requested an order restraining governors, their agents, and privies from receiving, spending, or tampering with funds released from the Federation Account for the benefit of local governments when no democratically elected local government system is in place in the states.

“Finally, the Federal Government sought an order stopping governors from constituting caretaker committees to run the affairs of local governments, contrary to the constitutionally recognized and guaranteed democratic system.”

Related Post